Aunty Agony

Over at the Spanking Facts & Research forum, there's a debate that Aunty's seen repeated in various forms on every spanking-related site at one time or another: Is it OK to for spankos to drool over reports of non-consensual spankings?

This time, the story concerns a young worker at a McDonald's restaurant in Kentucky who was made to perform all kinds of degrading acts - ranging from jumping jacks to oral sex, by a caller claiming to be a police officer and his all-too-willing accomplice, the fiance of the restaurant manager.

The girl also received a fairly severe OTK spanking during the incident, which has led to great excitement among some spankos.

Aunty saw this story some time ago and decided not to blog about it because it struck her as sensationalized sexual abuse. Basically, the victim really didn't need a bunch of spanking fetishists lapping up her trauma.

Interestingly, the readers of the SF&R forum seem divided about this story. There are those who are intensely titillated by the spanking component of the incident, such as the famous "Cinndunc" who writes:

Truthfully, I find the video fascinating. I know it's a crime being committed. But still, it's the only time I've ever seen a non-consensual spanking of an adult woman.

Then there are those who regard any spanko who enjoyed this news story as morally repugnant. The latter perspective is represented by "Culebrero", who states:

It is a bit troubling that folks might enjoy see a woman spanked severely despite the absence of consent. What's more troubling, though, is that the absence of consent might make it extra exciting. Whereas the first suggests a lack of empathy or respect, the latter seems actually sadistic. I wonder how many consider the fact that girl in this video truly wanted no part of it to be a plus?

Aunty has three thoughts on this story:

First - The female store manager should have been jailed for allowing herself to be duped by such an obvious hoax, and for leaving her burly fiance to "guard" a semi-naked teen girl.

Second, her fiance, the guy "obeying" the phony police-officer's orders was clearly taking the opportunity to commit sexual assault. Accordingly, he should be jailed for as long as possible.

Third, and most importantly, the victim's parents and teachers should be spanked for training her to "always obey adults". Didn't they clarify with the basic warnings about being wary of strangers - not to mention educating her on her basic civil and legal rights when suspected of a crime?

The girl was clearly a victim, but she was also jaw-droppingly naive. Her community failed her by providing inadequate education.

And as for people enjoying this stuff - good luck to them. The moralists at SF&R clearly don't understand that these kinds of stories shock and titillate millions of people. That's why the video was shown on 20/20 and posted online. It's the ultimate tabloid fodder, even more so because an attractive, "90 lbs" teenager was caught in the middle.

Like it or not, spankos aren't the only consumers who go all mushy over this kind of story - there are literally millions of vanilla-minded folk who also lap this stuff up.

Finally, those wishing to, umm, do more research, can visit this thread at SF&R which contains various links to more information on this story, including video. Aunty has decided to refrain from offering any direct links in this case.

Labels: spanking consent