Busted ...
This board is simply the best place on the 'net to find all sorts of obscure information on the spanking experiences of the famous, the infamous and, increasingly, people who would otherwise live out their days in obscurity were it not for their appearance in fun-spanking clips posted to YouTube and MySpace.
Most of these spanking clips are too dark, badly filmed or just plain boring. Nevertheless fans of SF&R, including Aunty, lap this stuff up.
Occasionally, clips depicting minors are posted, prompting outraged denunciations from the vast majority of forum members who have little time for material of that ilk.
Aunty is sometimes perplexed by SF&R postings wherein a female YouTube "vlogger" makes mild reference to spanking.
Especially valuable, it seems, are vlogs where the "star" makes mention of her own history of disciplinary spanking.
And it was a clip like this that briefly excited some SF&R attention ...That is, until Lou, the "vlogger" discovered (probably through a tip-off from a forum member) that many of her new "fans" were spanking-obsessed "weirdos", less interested in the lively debate on school spanking she was trying to spark, than in her long-ago childhood spankings.
Here is her first vlog following this discovery.
posted by Aunty Agony at 2/08/2007 10:08:00 PM
11 Comments:
Well-done Lou for responding, and thank you Aunty for posting this on.
Well-done SFR for yet again making all spanko's look like dripping, dribbling scum in raincoats.
The further along we go, the more we regress.
I wish to disassociate myself from this entire scene, its becoming puerile, self obsessed, selfish and with the addition of SFR, moronic and dangerous.
You need only to look at the minds of SFR’s contributors to know why big brother in the UK has decided to draft legislation that will make it an offence to view material involving consensual S&M activities.
I feel ashamed to be a spanko.
Sorry, but it's hard to have too much sympathy here. She's actively trying to get people's attention with her videos. She should know that why people watch her videos isn't completely under her control.
I have always found SF&R to be an interesting resource. It start out quite simply, but has added a lot over the years. Much of what is contained on SF&R deals with actual spanking and the historical background of spanking, school, and prison punishments. I've never found their portrayal to be overtly sexual in nature--more informative and historical.
I haven't watched the videos on there (had a problem initally getting one to load and then gave up ages ago). Of course, I don't typically get turned on both those types of representations or discussions. Same goes for most vanilla spanking shots...I think they're cute, but they don't do much for me in any other regard.
At any rate, thanks Aunty for posting this--interesting vlog (that's a new word for me :) )
Ruby
I can quite understand Lou's PoV, and her bemusement, and I thought she expressed herself pretty well - and with a fair degree of broad-mindedness too.
But the last poster has a point: if I put my image, or my words, on the web I have no control over how others think about, or talk about, them. People are aroused by the oddest things - considerably less predictable than a very pretty young woman talking about spanking, tbh! - & the possibility that someone, somewhere, is whacking off over my holiday pics or blogged description of my dental surgery is just a risk (if that's how you see it) that I tacitly accept when I post them online.
Having said that, I agree with graeme in that some of the SFR posters do seem a bit ... well, let's just they don't make the best ambassadors for anything.
Dear Aunty,
Oh Boo-Hoo! A little Jennifer Love Hewitt clone feels violated because the vlog has been misinterpreted and/or used for masturbatory purposes by "weirdos." Wake up and smell the fetishists my dear. There are probably thousands of them watching your vlog right now that are so "strange" they are climaxing every time you brush your hair behind your ear. Hell, as soon as I heard you bleating out this nonsense I wanted to turn you over my knee and spank you!Once an item is posted it is available to the entire online population and there isn't a ding-dang-diddley thing you can do about it. Grow up and shake some of that Floridian sand out of your ears young lady. And for goodness sake, if you need people to send you ideas so you can have interesting things to talk about, maybe you should be studying about what has happened on this planet in the last ten thousand years instead of vlogging all of this uneducated and time-wasting drivel.
Love you Aunty...
Vini Demon
as far as i am concerned the girl would only have trouble if the discussion that aunty mentioned had taken place at her webspace. if not, she has no right to wail about it. media and the use of media is totally free.
if someone buys a cd and puts it up his a.., listens to is or simply destroys it, nobody has the right to blame this person for it, as it is your use for yourself.
it seems like paris hilton would cry about pictures of her being published and discussed somewhere else.
if you publish you cannot control what people do with it. if you want to do that you have to learn from totalitarian regimes. and the message of the girl - come on - little princess on a pea? but on the other hand she can turn anybody on if she wants... welcome to the world that is different than all the secure tv-series.
I really want to know who this wylers guy is!! Every spanking video that I have posted myself on youtube he has come on there to say something stupid about it. Now it seems he also surfs spanking websites. This guy has a story and I'd love to know what it is. On the video 'juke joint' that I posted on youtube i called him a dick today, maybe I will go back there and find out a little more about this mystery. Heck, I might just give him my own little 15 minutes on my blog, that should be fun :-)
Richard Windsor.
Well Lou is asking if this video has been linked again due to excessive hits, I'm sure wylers will be on the case. For what it's worth, I think that Lou expressed her opinion well and I can understand her bemusement, however, this is not a world she knows by her simple comment that she didn't want to give a guy a boner!! That probably defeats the whole purpose of the original discussion, though I can't admit to having read it. I think if it was explained to her why it was discussed then she may have a different understanding, though I doubt if she would still want to be the focus in such a discussion. BTW, that Wookie impression was pretty good :-)
I think people are overreacting to her comments. She wasn't demanding retractions or saying people shouldn't be allowed to say whatever they want about her vlogs, just that some of the inferences by SFR and attempting to publicly mine it for titillation are, to use her words, "not cool." It was an appeal to courtesy and respect, which hopefully the Internet has not made totally obsolete.
Anonymous (right above this post) -I totally agree with you. She later commented in the SF&R forum apologizing for calling people weird, etc. She struck me as quite broad-minded really.
I could not find her comment/apology at SF&R. In any event, I don't think she needed to, necessarily. It was very responsible of her if she did, which seems to be her general modus operandi.
We spankos are very sensitive to any criticism, or implied criticism, with good reason. Many of us have enough failed relationships and friendships with vanilla folks in our pasts to know that one must still be circumspect about who this fetish is discussed with, and skeptical about who is choosing to discuss it at all. Spanking is not a topic about which anyone has the slightest objectivity, no matter what side of the debate they choose.
That said, she seems like an unusually reasonable, smart kid to me. From the spankophilic perspective, it'd be nice if one day Lou, and other smart, Web savvy kids like her, also learned that having a right to their opinions doesn't mean their opinions are right. Perhaps that will start happening if a few adults set a good example first and start actually learning something about their chosen issue before they mouth off in public. I'm not talking about anyone in this particular conversation, I'm talking about the overall Internet idea that it's simply a mindless forum for any anonymous geek to adopt a snarky voice and rant just to be ranting. That's just noise, not democracy.
In contrast, I think Lou does herself, and us, justice, by continually admitting she doesn't know much yet. If you've been around many teenagers, you know that that kind of self-awareness and humility(!) is very rare indeed, if not completely unheard-of.
Post a Comment
<< Home